Received: by netcom.com (8.6.8.1/SMI-4.1/Netcom) id VAA05923; Fri, 24 Jun 1994 21:18:31 -0700
Received: from iems.jpl.nasa.gov by netcom.com (8.6.8.1/SMI-4.1/Netcom) id PAA26317; Fri, 24 Jun 1994 15:58:54 -0700
Received: from elm.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (elm.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.47.3]) by iems.jpl.nasa.gov (8.6.8/8.6.6) with SMTP id PAA03026 for <lightwave-l@netcom.com>; Fri, 24 Jun 1994 15:55:43 -0700
Received: from oak.Jpl.Nasa.Gov by elm.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (4.1/SMI-4.1+DXRm2.5) id AA27707; Fri, 24 Jun 94 15:55:47 PDT
Received: from tulip.jpl.nasa.gov by oak.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (4.1/SMI-4.1+DXRs2.3) id AA22222; Fri, 24 Jun 94 15:55:42 PDT
Message-Id: <9406242255.AA22222@oak.Jpl.Nasa.Gov>
X-Sender: gamez@oak.jpl.nasa.gov
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 15:55:40 -0700
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
From: gamez@elm.jpl.nasa.gov (Enrique Gamez)
Subject: VTU vs Lightwave Pro magazines...
X-Mailer: <PC Eudora Version 1.4b18>
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
I heard someone mention these magazines and it triggered a thought...
Has anyone other than me noticed a marked decrease in the technical
Lightwave content in VTU, now that Lightwave Pro is out? It seems that
Lightwave Pro is SUCKING all the great articles away from VTU, causing VTU
to turn into another AVVideo!
I get BOTH magazines, so why am I crabbing? 'Cause I want more! That's why
I bought PRO, not to see VTU diminish in usefulness.
I believe a letter writing campaign to the publisher is in order!
